Discussion:
Bush has lost the war in Iraq. Connies trying hard to cover his incompetent ass
(too old to reply)
Paddy O'Shea
2006-12-11 13:59:18 UTC
Permalink
Bush lost the war in Iraq, and he's working hard of losing Afghanistan.

You guys really have so very much to be proud of ..
http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/20902.html
by John Lillpop
Democrats Rejoice in Bad Iraq News
December 09, 2006 01:00 PM EST
As the findings of the Iraq Panel reverberated throughout the universe
on Wednesday, it was difficult to tell who was more thrilled by the
public stoning of President Bush.
Did Islamofascists celebrate with the most gusto, or was it Democrat
politicians who cheered the loudest at the awful news about America's
apparent failed policy in the Iraqi theater of the war on terror?
Incoming majority leader Harry Reid of Nevada promised that, starting
in 2007, the Democrat-majority U.S. Senate will pursue a more
aggressive oversight role, including an examination of faulty
intelligence that helped to form the justification for the 44- month
conflict.
``We are going to look on how the intelligence was manipulated prior to
going to war,'' Reid told reporters.
Isn't that just so typical of an out-of-touch liberal? Reid is full
of himself when it comes to "Getting Bush," but utters nary a word
about doing whatever it takes to win the war.
Why in Hades do Democrats refuse to rally around the United States and
it's commander-in-chief during time of war?
Come on Democrats, you have both chambers of Congress and Rumsfeld's
head. It is time to win this danged war, rather than playing partisan
politics-- especially with so much at stake for the United States and
the entire world!
Furthermore, President Bush and the Republicans did not go into Iraq
without substantial support from Democrats.
For example, on October 11, 2002, the United States Senate passed the
Joint Resolution, which authorized military action against Iraq.
Of the 77 votes cast in support, 29 were cast by Democrats including
Bayh (D-IN)
Biden (D-DE)
Clinton (D-NY)
Daschle (D-SD)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Edwards (D-NC)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Schumer (D-NY)
Oh, and let us not overlook another liberal who said Yea! That would be
Harry Reid, from the great state of Nevada!
The final roll call for that historic vote is available here.
Those 29 Senate Democrats were joined by 81 Democrats in the U.S.
House, including the likes of Jack Murtha, Tom Lantos, Patrick Kennedy,
and William J. Jefferson.
All told, 110 Democrats joined most Republicans in authorizing
President Bush to take military actions necessary to defend this nation
against future threats.
To be sure, things have not gone well in Iraq, and America needs to
find out what went wrong and why. But our immediate focus should be on
winning the war on terror, rather than mutilating a sitting U.S.
president in order to set the stage for the 2008 presidential
elections.
As to the "Bush Lied, People Died" foolishness spouted by liberal
kooks, remember that, according to leftist politicians and the liberal
media, G.W. Bush is a stupid simpleton.
That characterization begs the question: How was an
intelligence-challenged Republican president able to manipulate 110
brilliant Democrats into voting for war?
Perhaps the real simpletons are those with a D next to their names?
zzpat
2006-12-11 16:49:56 UTC
Permalink
All told, 110 Democrats joined most Republicans in authorizing
President Bush to take military actions necessary to defend this nation
against future threats.
To be sure, things have not gone well in Iraq, and America needs to
find out what went wrong and why. But our immediate focus should be on
winning the war on terror, rather than mutilating a sitting U.S.
president in order to set the stage for the 2008 presidential
elections.
As to the "Bush Lied, People Died" foolishness spouted by liberal
kooks, remember that, according to leftist politicians and the liberal
media, G.W. Bush is a stupid simpleton.
That characterization begs the question: How was an
intelligence-challenged Republican president able to manipulate 110
brilliant Democrats into voting for war?
Perhaps the real simpletons are those with a D next to their names?
Are conservatives this dumb? The authorization to use force came BEFORE
UN inspectors were on the ground in Iraq. Bush begged Congress for
authorization so the US would speak with one-voice before the UN.

The UN listened, put inspectors back in Iraq and the inspectors found
nothing. That should have been the end of the story.

The fact that Bush demanded the authorization weeks before the mid-term
election in 2002 and he withheld information about Korea's nukes is
sufficient to know with absolute certainty that Bush lied. The fact
that he promised to get an up or down vote in the UN and then cut and
ran is also sufficient.

Democrats are being attacked for believing the lies of the Bush White
House. If that's the best the right wing can do, they should go away.
--
Pat
Impeach Bush
http://zzpat.bravehost.com/

Articles of Impeachment
Center for Constitutional Rights
http://zzpat.bravehost.com/april_2006/articles_of_impeachment.html
Clay
2006-12-11 20:15:43 UTC
Permalink
Paddy -- 'Nuff said <LOL>:
...
Post by Paddy O'Shea
Bush lost the war in Iraq, and he's working hard of losing Afghanistan.
Then who is winning, genius?
Post by Paddy O'Shea
You guys really have so very much to be proud of ..
Unlike leftists... who have NOTHING to be proud of.

Not a damn thing... and you idiots know it.

Too fucking funny.

-C-
Emmanuel Goldstein
2006-12-12 00:49:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Clay
...
Post by Paddy O'Shea
Bush lost the war in Iraq, and he's working hard of losing Afghanistan.
Then who is winning, genius?
Osama bin laden has succeeded beyond his wildest dreams.
Bush has even stopped chasing him.
Post by Clay
Post by Paddy O'Shea
You guys really have so very much to be proud of ..
Unlike leftists... who have NOTHING to be proud of.
Not a damn thing... and you idiots know it.
I'm glad you're taking your election whupping so well.
Paddy O'Shea
2006-12-12 07:35:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Emmanuel Goldstein
Post by Clay
...
Post by Paddy O'Shea
Bush lost the war in Iraq, and he's working hard of losing Afghanistan.
Then who is winning, genius?
Osama bin laden has succeeded beyond his wildest dreams.
Bush has even stopped chasing him.
Post by Clay
Post by Paddy O'Shea
You guys really have so very much to be proud of ..
Unlike leftists... who have NOTHING to be proud of.
Not a damn thing... and you idiots know it.
I'm glad you're taking your election whupping so well.
Clay has only a passing familiarity with the affairs of planet Earth.
Emmanuel Goldstein
2006-12-13 20:24:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Clay
...
Post by Paddy O'Shea
Bush lost the war in Iraq, and he's working hard of losing Afghanistan.
Then who is winning, genius?
Post by Paddy O'Shea
You guys really have so very much to be proud of ..
Unlike leftists... who have NOTHING to be proud of.
Not a damn thing... and you idiots know it.
Too fucking funny.
-C-
I enjoyed the election results, too.

Loading...